3.
"USA" nursing Islam to destabilize the "Soviet Union" - construction of
WTC - remote controlled airplanes
Boeing
for example from American Airlines AA, with remote control as all
"American"
airplanes from Boeing in the "USA" have
|
Mullah
Ayatollah Khomenei, a "tool" of the CIA against the Soviet Union
|
by
Michael
Palomino (2004 / 2006)
from: Andreas
von Bülow: CIA and the 11
September. International Terror an The Role Of the Secret Services
[orig.: "Die CIA und der 11. September.
Internationaler Terror und die Rolle der Geheimdienste"]. Piper
edition.
Munich/Zurich 2003]
1950-2004
"USA": World dominance in the underground by liquidation of so
called communists
The "US" "services" are liquidating the politicians of
liberation movements in several countries of the "Third World" because
they are rated as potential communists (p.35).
1950s
Remote control: GB develops the remote control of airplanes
for fighting jets
with remote controlled starts and landings (p.189-190).
1950 approx.
Iran: Minister president Mossadegh has the courage to demand
for more oil profit for his country
-- Mossadegh demands the rise of the state's part concerning
the oil profits of the international oil companies
-- Mossadegh demands partly even the nationalization of the oil industry
->> the European and "American" industrial powers are alarmed and
plan a putsch (p.34)
1951
Iran: The Shah gets to the government
-- in a common action of English and "American" secret
services
-- with the protection by the mullahs who are against any democracy
-- minister president Mossadegh is disassembled (S.34).
March 1962
Cuba war plan by General Lemnitzer for Kennedy: Operation
Northwoods - Kennedy rejects
-- the plan is made in the name and with the signature of the united
chief of staff
-- Kennedy should begin a hidden bloody terror war against the own
country with murders in the "USA" in the streets, with hits against
fugitive boats from Cuba, with outbreak of terror at Washington C.C.,
Miami etc., with hijacked airplane, a plane with "American" students on
a flight to holiday to Jamaica, Guatemala or Venezuela should be
exchanged and the exchanged empty plane should be shoot down etc.
-- by this the mood in the "American" public should be manipulated in
favor of an invasion against Cuba
-- for the bomb terror not guilty people should be blamed, and evidence
should be faked
-- also possible would be to pretend a launch of an "American" fighting
jet by Cuban MIGs over the international Sea
->> Kennedy resigns this plan and by this the plan stays in the
list of the CIA (p.230).
In: John W.Whitehead: Operation Northwoods: Déjà vu or Coincidence?
["Operation Northwoods: Already seen somewhere, or coincidence?"]; In:
http://www.razormouth.com, 3 March 2003 (2005 not actual any more)
About the planned operation Northwoods against Cuba see e.g.: http://www.newsatelier.de/html/northwoods.html
1970s
Remote control: The "American" air defense performs remote
controlled starts and landings with remote controlled fighting jets
e.g. from California to Australia and back (p.194)
In: Carol A.Valentine: Operation 911 - No Suicide Pilots; Rense.com
Remote control: "USA": Development of a remote control "Flight
Control System" for civil airplanes by DARPA
DARPA in the Pentagon is responsible for the realization of military
developments for the civil market. DARPA develops a remote control
system also for civil airliners under the pretext that it would be
possible to take a hijacked airplane out of the hijackers hands and to
land the airplane safe. The system contains:
-- listening operator for cockpit talks
-- the takeover of the whole airplane management and an automatized
landing as if it would be a remote controlled model airplane
-- all is going by a code from "super secret" computers
-- the maximum number of airplanes to be remote controlled at the same
time is 4
->> misuse is possible when the code of the "super secret"
computers is known (p.190).
-- the remote control can operate the hydraulic systems over the
sensors of the automatic pilot
-- in the computer all details of the map of the airports are saved
("Avionic"), so a remote controlled landing is also possible when there
is no sight (p.191).
in: Joe Vialls: Home Run. Electronically Hijacking the World Trade
Center Attack Aircraft; Oct. 2001,
latest revision 11.4.2002
1970s
The WTC is built - there is not too much profit with it
Bülow:
"The office rooms of the WTC towers never were fully rented, and the
business was not at all a huge profit."
(orig.: "Die Büroräume der WTC-Türme waren nie voll ausgelastet, das
Geschäft
keineswegs übermässig profitabel." (p.212)
since 1972
The air forces of Europe and in the "USA" are prepared to
airplane attacks
(p.177), during the opening session of the Olympic games at
Munich e.g. has to be caught an airplane from Yugoslavia which comes
near to the Olympia site, and defense minister Leber is glad that he
had not to give the order to shoot the plane down (p.176-177).
since middle of the 1970s / since 1975 ca.
Remote control: The "flight control system" is implanted in all
Boeing airplanes
-- landings without sight are always possible (p.191)
-- there are separate channels planted in the board computers ("back
doors"), promoted by the DARPA, with a port to the "flying control
system" (p.192)
Remote control: Development of transponders for an automatic
contact between cockpit and earth control
The transponders give to the earth control
-- a signal of the number of the airplane
-- a signal of the position of the airplane
-- signals to omit a collision
-- and the transponder can also serve as a directional receiver for a
remote control of the airplane (p.192).
-- all functions can be steered by the transponder from outside
(p.192)
-- the flight recorder and the voice recorder from the cockpit are not
functioning during this time when the remote control is longer than 30
minutes, so after 30 minutes the bands are empty (p.193).
Remote control: European companies do not want the remote
control in their airliners
The operators in the board computers are taken out. But up to
the year 2000 about 600 "American" airliners have the remote control
with their "back doors" in their board computer installed. Other
European airlines do not trust to the remote control system and take
the remote control operation systems off (p.193).
In: Carol A.Valentine: Operation 911 - No Suicide Pilots; Rense.com
since 1976 approx.
Long time tactics of Zbigniew Brzezinski against the "SU" with
support of Islam e.g. in Afghanistan
-- plan of Zbigniew Brzezinski, safety "consultant" of president
Carter, and the plan is performed since the 1970s
-- with the aim to install a belt of Islamic states around the "SU" so
the Muslim neighbor populations of the "SU" are destabilized, and by
this whole "SU" will be destabilized (p.34)
The "USA" manipulates Iran and Iraq
one against the other - Israel supports Iran
1978
Iran: Ayatollah revolution: "USA" tolerates the fundamentalist
revolution
and accepts the mullahs under Khomeini who is coming from Paris
exile: The action should destabilize the "SU" (p.34).
[But the "SU" is financed by "US" banks, so it's only a very
destructive play with the world of the stupid "USA"].
1979
"USA"-Iraq: The "US" administration promotes Saddam Hussein
-- Saddam is taking over the whole power with the help of the
CIA
(p.34-35)
-- the CIA delivers Saddam a list of the persons who should be
neutralized, about 5,000 persons who are dangerous concerning the oil
policy: Saddam is following the list and lets murder all about 5,000
people (p.35).
1980s
"USA"-Iraq: The "US" policy is pushing Saddam to a war against
Iran with the promise Iran would be weak because of the Mullahs
The pretended aim is:
-- the spread of the Mullah revolution has to be hindered
-- Iraq should have as compensation for the war some more Iran oil
fields and the West is friendly to him and any wish is fulfilled for
Saddam (p.35), above all arm's delivery (p.35-36)
-- the "USA" urge the states of the Arab peninsula to support Saddam
against Iran with the aim to weaken the fundamentalist regime there,
because the "USA" want this kind of regime only on the border to the
"SU" (p.35)
-- the "USA" grant Saddam financial aid for weapons with money from the
agriculture programs (export support), not authorized by the Congress
-- according to Bülow Iraq becomes a "weapon's Eldorado" and Iraq
becomes one of the worldwide meeting centers for the international
secret services
-- "USA" deliver to Saddam production resources and raw material for
chemical weapons, against any blocking treaty, over the intermediary Barbouti, e.g. machines are produced
in Hong Kong and delivered
over Germany to Iraq, then the scandal is coming out
in Germany, but at the same time the British "American" connections are
hardly published in the media, and the media blame Germany to bring
Israel's existence in danger by chemical weapons delivered to Saddam,
without telling the whole story of the British and "American" activities
-- the weapon producers are discharged
-- the "American" and the British exporters are not mentioned in the
press (p.36).
1980
Saddam's war against Iran: Manipulations by CIA for Iraq - and
by the Mossad for Iran
The details about this manipulated war are
cruel:
-- poison gas is deployed which was produced
by machines traded by
"American" and British hands
-- Donald Rumsfeld visits Saddam in charge of Reagan and knows of the poison gas
attacks
-- the "USA" deliver Saddam biological weapons, underneath is Anthrax
(p.36)
-- "US" secret services deliver Iraq satellite fotos of Iran positions,
fotos of the Iran forces etc.
-- "US" secret services also deliver the counter part, Iran, with
satellite fotos, e.g. together with Mossad, to hinder an Iraqi
breakthrough
-- Europe delivers weapons to Iraq, and Israel to Iran
-- Israel itself gets new weapons from the "USA" which are resold to
Iran with a 300% price surcharge, and by this operations the secret
Israeli party accounts are filled up (p.37).
plus:
"USA" ban Iran with an embargo: A project for a gas pipeline
from
Turkmenistan over Iran and over Turkey is deleted
and the new plan is a gas pipeline over Pakistan and
Afghanistan to the Indian Ocean, and for this there is a friendly
government in Afghanistan needed (p.47).
[So, wouldn't it be better to have peace, stupid CIA?]
