Lie of the moon
landing:
Links and fotos that
the moon landing has occurred in Langley
The production of the "moon
landings" in the simulation centers in Houston and Langley
Summary
from Michael Palomino (2005 / 2006)
Row of spotlights of the studio
on the helmet: the absolute proof of the moon lie, picture
no.
as12-49-7281.
"The Moon was the Earth." Michael
Palomino, 2006-05-31
This is
no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are
facts!
Recommendation
of literature:
--
Gernot
L. Geise: Der grösste
Betrug des
Jahrhunderts?
Die APOLLO-Mondflüge;
Hohenpeissenberg 2000, ISBN
3-932539-23-0; EFEDON
publisher, European community for early technology and margine
area of science.
-- Anonymus: Die
Apollo-Mondflüge:
Betrug
oder grandiose Technik-Geschichte? [Anonymus: The Apollo moon
flights: Fraud
or great technique history?] http://www.artemodus.de/cars/MOND.HTM
(June 2005)
-- Goddard's
Journal; http://iangoddard.net/moon01.htm
(June 2005)
-- Serge Brunier: Aufbruch ins All [start into space];
Cosmos Edition 2001
-- Brian Jones: Weltraumforschung
[engl.: Space research]; Herder
Edition 1990
-- Barbara Hehner / Greg
Ruhl: Auf dem Mond. Augenzeugen berichten [engl.: On the moon. Eye
witnesses are reporting]; Carlsen Edition, Hamburg 1999. [But the
eye witnesses are no eye witnesses, but they are actors under military
order...]
[Comment:
The most tremendous fraud of the
century ist the financing of Communism and of the Third Reich
The false landing of the moon is not the biggest fraud of the century.
The most tremendous fraud is the financing of Communism and the Third Reich by swanky and
arrogant "American" financiers at the same time, and Communism had been
financed also after 1945 yet.
The clique of the "US" government (all "Free Masons" and "Illuminates")
has created their enemies themselves to
be always the "winner" at the end and to agitate on each other. THIS is
the MOST TREMENDOUS FRAUD OF THE CENTURY, and the "USA" has never been
torn to trial for these crimes. But the "Nuremberg" for the "USA" will
come for sure... Michael Palomino]
The proofs for a false
landing on the moon
| One
single little light above at the left
side |
 |
Frontal foto from
Alan Bean (APOLLO 12, picture no. as12-49-7278). On the left side in
the background parts of the ceiling construction of the film studio an
a single spotlight can
be seen.
from: Gernot L. Geise: Neue
Widersprüche um
Apollo [New contradictions
about Apollo]; In: EFODON-SYNESIS Nr.5 / 2002; http://www.efodon.de/html/archiv/weltraum/apollo/ap2002-1.htm
(June 2005)
This scene is produced at the moon hall in Houston.
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| An
entire row of spotlights mirrored on the helmet |
|
Frontal foto from
Alan Bean (APOLLO 12, picture no. as12-49-7281, cutout). On the helmet
Charles Conrad is mirrored who is taking the foto (this is an
impossibility), but add to this there can be seen a total row of
spotlights of the studio. Compare with the upper foto where no
spotlight can be seen.
from: Gernot L. Geise: Neue
Widersprüche um
Apollo [New contradictions about Apollo]; In: EFODON-SYNESIS Nr.5 /
2002; http://www.efodon.de/html/archiv/weltraum/apollo/ap2002-1.htm
(June 2005)
This scene is produced at the moon hall in Houston.
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| A wrong
camera position coming from the top |
|
The
famous foto from Buzz Aldrin (Apollo 11, AS11-40-5903). Who has taken
it? From
Armstrong it cannot be because the position from which it's taken is
too high. Hasselblad's camera has been fixed on the chest (as here on
Aldrin's chest). The mirrored
skyline on the helmet seems to be copied in later: It's not
corresponding with the angle of the foto.
from: Anonym: Die
Apollo-Mondflüge:
Betrug
oder grandiose Technik-Geschichte?
[Anonymus: The Apollo moon
flights: Fraud or great technique history?]
http://www.artemodus.de/cars/MOND.HTM
(June 2005)
This scene is a foto composition.
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
|
The
shadows are going in all directions
As many different shadow lines seem to have the condition that there
are many different spotlights.
|
|
 Apollo 16, foto number
AS16-107-17446.
Astronaut Charles Duke at the Rover.
Shadows in all directions are only
possible on the "moon", when there are coming many spotlights from
different directions. Or the
foto is a bad "composition"...
Image without indication of
the shadow lines: from: Serge Brunier:
Aufbruch ins All [start into space]; Edition Cosmos 2001, p.98.
This scene is a foto composition .
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| An
"American" flag without shadow |
Another example of failed
foto montage is the following foto where not
only the shadow lines are different, but the shadow of the flag is
missing totally:
|
|
Moon lie: Foto with astronaut Edwin
Aldrin, Apollo
11, AS11-40-5874 und
AS11-40-5875.
Shadow lines are going in
all directions, and the flag has no
shadow.
Foto from: Barbara Hehner /
Greg
Ruhl: Auf dem Mond. Augenzeugen berichten [engl.: On the moon. Eye
witnesses are reporting]; Carlsen Edition, Hamburg 1999, p.30. But the
eye witnesses are no eye witnesses...
According to NASA this
foto is the original. But also on the original NASA foto a shadow of
the flag cannot be found:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5875.jpg
This foto is a foto composition.
|
The same foto exists also
mirror-inverted.
|
|
Moon lie: Foto
with astronaut Edwin Aldrin, Apollo 11, AS11-40-5874 und AS11-40-5875.
Shadow lines are going
in all
directions, and the flag has no
shadow at all, also
mirror-inverted not. Fotomontage
is also fotomontage when the foto is mirrored. It's a fotomontage.
from: Brian Jones: Weltraumforschung [engl.: Space research]; Herder
Edition 1990, p.49
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| A
shadow of an astronaut is much too long |
At another foto of Apollo 11
there can be seen two astronauts which -
so the official version sais - they are taken from a foto camera by
remote control from the earth, and the camera is fixet at the top of
the landing sphere. The foto shows how the astronauts are fixing the
"American" flag. But the shadow from the right astronaut is much too
long compared with the shadow of the left astronaut, absolutely not
real:
|
|
Moon lie Apollo 11: The shadow of
the
right astronaut is much longer than the shadow of the left astronaut.
The shadow of the right astronaut is much too long between vertex and
waistline. The proportions are not right.
Foto from: Barbara Hehner / Greg
Ruhl: Auf dem Mond. Augenzeugen berichten [engl.: On the moon. Eye
witnesses are reporting]; Carlsen Edition, Hamburg 1999, p.31. But the
eye witnesses are no eye witnesses...
This is foto composition.
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| Moon
landing sphere without crater - the
space suit is not blown up |
|
On
the left: The moon landing sphere from APOLLO 12: Moon lie Apollo 12:
Landing without any landing crater, and the space suit is not blown up.
Astronaut Bean aside the landing sphere: Here
you see precisely that under the power unit the dust is not blown
away and there is no landing crater burnt into the moon's soil.
And when this scene is
taken in the
vacuum on the moon: Why the
space suit is not blown up?
|
From:
Anonym: Die Apollo-Mondflüge: Betrug
oder grandiose
Technik-Geschichte?
[Anonymus: The Apollo moon flights: Fraud
or great technique history?]
http://www.artemodus.de/cars/MOND.HTM
(June 2005)
This scene is at the simulation center in Houston.
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| Dust around the landing foot -
no dust on the
landing foot - landing feet in cling film? |
|
Left:
One of the landing feet from landing sphere "Eagle" (APOLLO 11): As
it's visible from the many of the traces there never had been blown
away any dust by the power
unit during the landing.
This foto is made at the simulation center at Langley or Houston.
|
I ask
myself
what can this be good for to
pack the landing feet into cling film? The feet had not been of metal
but of heat proof and cold proof materials? Or should be hidden that
there was put in a plastic or a peace of wood?
from:
Anonym:
Die Apollo-Mondflüge: Betrug oder grandiose Technik-Geschichte?
[Anonymus: The Apollo moon flights: Fraud
or great technique history?]
http://www.artemodus.de/cars/MOND.HTM
(Juni 2005)
|
No
dust on the landing foot, but around is
a lot of "moon dust":
|
|
Moon lie: Another landing foot
without dust on it,
but with
much dust around it
with many footprints. These circumstances are impossible when a sphere
should have been landed by power engine.
Image
from: Serge Brunier: Aufbruch ins All [start into space]; Cosmos
Edition 2001, p.93
This foto is made at
the simulation center at Langley or Houston.
|
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
| An art
fotografy with crosses in shadows? |
|
Moon lie: Crosses in shadows. It's a bad foto
composition...
|
Sun art fotografy with crosses in
shadows.
Why shoud astronauts have time on the moon for such jokes?
Image from: Serge Brunier: Aufbruch ins
All [start into space];
Cosmos Edition 2001, p.95 |
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
|
Moon
stones are radioactive and must not be investigated without protection
suit
|
 |
"Moon
stones" from APOLLO 12. When it's
radioactive why it's analyzed
without
radiant protective clothing?
from: Anonym: Die Apollo-Mondflüge:
Betrug
oder grandiose Technik-Geschichte?
[Anonymus: The Apollo moon flights: Fraud
or great technique history?]
http://www.artemodus.de/cars/MOND.HTM
(Juni 2005) |
This
is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
The
moon stones come
from Chile
The
professor for
geology John L. Parker
examined and analized the "moon stones" at Maine University. In this
institute also scientist Nelly Wason
was researching. During her research work in Atacama desert in the North of Chile
she detected a strange sort of stone. Later she found out that the
composition was exactly corresponding to the "moon stones" which John
L. Parker had examined.
Paker
already had
died when Nelly Wason was detecting this. She became mistrustful and
examined Parker's estate. In his remarks she found the proof that
Parker and a PR man from NASA Mark
Lecoq always knew well that the "moon stones" never had been
from the moon but from Atacama desert from Chile.
The
last thing
A curbed horizon on the helmet of astronaut Buzz Aldrin. This is a
painted picture, it's not a photo, you stupid journalist.
Conclusion:
The "USA"
are a dictatorship democracy and not capable for the truth - a
"Nuremberg" for the "USA"
It's not important to discuss
about a turned flagpole anymore which had been turned or not to give
proofs for the lie of the moon.
The landing on the moon is a
fraud, and the "American" population had been cheated out of 40 billion
Dollar.
The moon landing had been
staged for a bluff against Russia in the Cold War, not more.
The fact that something like
this can happen is a sign that in the "USA" something with the
structure of democracy seems to be heavily wrong. The secret
communities of the Free Masons and the Illuminates have too much power,
respectively other groups don't have any power. The "USA" are a
dictatorship democracy of the Free Masons, not more.
And all this is very deplorable
because terror "USA" - slowly but steadily - are really getting on the
world's nerves. We need a "Nuremberg" for the "USA" so the "USA" will
at last achieve a structure reform which corresponds to a democracy.
The secret communities of the
Free Masons and the Illuminates have to be dissolved completely. These
Free Masons are not at all "free", but they are obsessed by black magic
and betraying other people.
40 bn $ fraud sum? And these
human beings are still free and walking around the world?
The "Nuremberg" for the terror
"USA" could be in Den Haag...
But it's strange that until now
there has not been fount one single judge against these terror "USA".
Why the journalists do not believe
the facts? Moon landing is a lie.
This is no conspiracy
theory, you stupid journalist.
These are facts!
