previous next
"Moon plays": The moon was the Earth - Lies and Truth in the Atmosphere
14. The faked Gemini missions and the faked "moon probes"
The faked Gemini flights since Gemini 6A according to landing data - faked "moon fotos" of the "moon probes" Surveyor
Gemini 6A and 7 foto no.S65-63189: In the alleged rendezvous performance
structures of the hall can be clearly seen.
by Michael Palomino (2006)
Share with Facebook friends
from: Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum [Lies in Space]; Knaur 2006
The development of the atmosphere crafts "Gemini"
One can see that "SU" "Vostok" atmosphere craft was much bigger than "US" "Mercury", and "US" "Gemini" is about as big as "SU" "Vostok".
The impossible landing data from the Gemini missions since Gemini 6A
NASA claims that missions with Gemini atmosphere ships had been circling around the earth. But according to the landing data of the landing capsules all Gemini missions since Gemini 6A are a fake because the landings since Gemini 6A are much too precise to be real landings from an Earth orbit. Real landings from an Earth orbit mostly have an aberration of 100s up to 1,000s of km also in a very precise working team, and a precise landing can be only a lucky chance. But the Gemini flights since Gemini 6A are regularly this precise that they can only be explained by airdrops as it was made in training 1,000s of times.
(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle; Pomeroy 2002; Wisnewski, p.237-243).
[Add to this the "USA" wanted to be brilliant against the "SU" with "precise landings", and the media never want to have recognized the manipulations...]
Gemini landing data
Date of landing Atmosphere ship landed Aberration from the foreseen landing point 16 Feb 1965 / 2-16-1965 Gemini 6A 12.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 18 Dec1965 / 12-18-1965 Gemini 7 11.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 17 March 1966 / 3-17-1966 Gemini 8 2 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 6 June 1966 / 6-6-1966 Gemini 9A 0.7 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 21 July 1966 / 7-21-1966 Gemini 10 6.2 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 15 Sep 1966 / 9-15-1966 Gemini 11 4.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 15 Nov 1966 / 11-15-1966 Gemini 12 4.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
These Gemini landing data are from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.com: Splashdown, August 2006).
It's not strange that the CIA headquarters are situated at the same place as one of the simulation centers: at Langley...
Faked moon fotos from faked "moon probes" "Surveyor"
Surveyor 1: Alleged "moon landing" 30 May 1966 / 5-30-1966
Surveyor 2: Alleged "moon landing" 17 April 1967 / 4-17-1967
Surveyor 3: Alleged "moon landing" 8 Sep 1967 / 9-8-1967
Surveyor 4: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Nov 1967 / 11-7-1967
Surveyor 5: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Jan 1968 / 1-7-1968
All in all the Surveyor moon probes shall have transmitted over 85,000 fotos from the moon over a distance of 380,000 km to the Earth (Wisnewski, p.216).
But only considering the radio transmitting connection over this distance through the radioactive belts seems impossible. And NASA historian James R. Hansen reveals in his book "Spaceflight Revolution" the fraud directly unmasking alleged foto of surveyor as pictures from the moon simulation device "LOLA". The alleged first foto of an "Earth rise" (foto no. I-102H2) is in reality the foto L-66-6399.66 ("L" stands for Langley, the simulation center near Hampton in Virginia).
(Wisnewski, p.286-288).
[So there is the question if also all other "moon probes" are a fake, also these of the "Soviet Union". Because a radio transmitting connection of over 380,000 km seems absolutely doubtful and is also non controllable, and considering the rotation of the Earth, sch a connection is absolutely impossible. And at the same time NASA is numbering all their "photos" simulating a "scientific" manner of working, and the stupid media are believing this...].
But artificial moon surfaces are very real, according to NASA historian Hanson. Moon surfaces can be easily imitated,
(In: Hansen, James R.: Spaceflight Revolution, SP-4308, p.375; Internet edition, http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; Wisnewski, p.284-285)
and artificial moon surfaces can also be published on fotos very well and in fuzzy films as a "real moon surface". And the stupid media believe all, to rise their numbers of copies...
The money is in power - the truth is loosing...
