from: Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im
Weltraum [Lies in Space];
Knaur 2005
Middle of 1967 / after the fire in Apollo 1
The "USA" stands with the Apollo program in front of a
pile of broken glass
The Apollo capsule does not function, and the Lunar Module "Eagle" not
either (Wisnewski, p.115).
Every Apollo mission from Apollo 2 to 10 has about 20,000 failed
functions. Then since the "moon landings" since Apollo 11 suddenly
shall have been all without any fault.
(In: Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake? www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm (2006)
"US" propaganda is organizing a propaganda campaign now to perform at
least a "moon landing" in the media until the end of the 1960s.
According to the landing data on Earth from the flight back all Apollo
flights are a fake, because the landings on the Earth are much too
precise for a flight from an Earth orbit (Wisnewski, p'.237-243).
26 Feb 1966
Apollo
1
unmanned test
flight. The name "Apollo 1" is only internal. The official name is
AS-201 [Apollo-Saturn-201].
(http://de.wikipedia.com:
Apollo 4)
5 July 1966
Apollo
2
unmanned test
flight. The name "Apollo
2" is only internal. The
official name is AS-202 [Apollo-Saturn-202].
(http://de.wikipedia.com:
Apollo 4)
25 Aug 1966
Apollo
3
unmanned test flight. The name "Apollo
3" is only internal. The
official name is AS-203 [Apollo-Saturn-203].
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)
27 Jan 1967
Apollo
1 accident
The test with three dead victims is retrospectively named "Apollo 1".
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)
April 1967
NASA takes the decision that next flight is named
"Apollo 4"
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)
4 Nov 1967
Apollo
4
Apollo 4 is the first unmanned flight with a Saturn V rocket. The
landing capsule is said to have landed in the Atlantic officially.
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)
22 Jan 1968
Apollo
5
The internal name is AS-204. There flies the rocket of Apollo 1 which
has not started with Apollo 1 and only was standing on the launch pad.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 5)
The rocket flies in a near Earth orbit and has a Lunar Module on board
(Lunar Module 1, LM-1), but according to Wisnewski without landing
feet. The effect of the hard cosmic radiation on the electronic devices
on board of the Lunar Module is not tested, and the performing of the
landing feet of the Lunar Module in the high atmosphere not either. The
landing engine is burning for 4 seconds instead of 39 seconds.
(In: Apollo 5: www.astrolink.de/m001/m001022/ (2006); Wisnewski, p.120)
Then the board computer stops the engine ahead of time, says the
official version.
(In: http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 5)
The Lunar Module flies in its orbit and dies down on 12th February 1968
in the lower dense atmosphere.
For NASA these 4 seconds of a functioning landing engine are enough.
Another flight test with the Lunar Module is not performed, but instead
of a Lunar Module there is only dead freight in the rocket in the next
alleged flights.
The next delivered Lunar Module, Lunar Module 2 (LM-2) is not used but
is brought directly to the museum, the National Air and Space
Museum at
Washington DC.
(In:
Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with the
CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006);
Wisnewski, p.120)
4 April 1968
Apollo
6
flies according to Wisnewski without Lunar Module with dead freight.
(In: Paul
Filmer:
What happened to the Apollo LEMs after
docking with the CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006);
Wisnewski, p.120)
After engine problems the rocket cannot reach the planned orbit and
gets into an elliptic orbit. Officially the capsule lands in a distance
of 80 km from the planned landing point in the Atlantic.
(http://en.wikipedia.org: Apollo 6)
11-22 Oct 1968
Faked
flight Apollo 7
Officially Apollo 7 is the first manned flight in an Apollo capsule,
the maiden flight (Wisnewski, p.110).
A pilot for the Lunar Module is officially on board, but there is
officially no Lunar Module on board, but only dead freight.
(In:
Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with the
CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006);
Wisnewski, p.120)
The official astronauts on board are Donn Eisele, Walter Schirra
and Walter
Cunningham.
(http://de.wikipedia.com:
Apollo 7)
According to the landing data with a distance from the planned landing
point of 3,5 km respectively 3 km the landing of the manned capsule is
much too precise to come from an orbit flight. This is a faked flight:
The rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop
over the landing spot as if it had been in training 1000s of times
already.
(In:
Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion
Dollar
Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski,
p.238-243).
[But the greedy
media greedy for sensations are reporting a perfect flight to make
propaganda against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of
the newspapers].
21-27 Dec 1968
Faked
flight Apollo 8
Officially Apollo 8 has got a pilot for a Lunar Module on board, but
also officially there is no
Lunar Module on board but only dead freight. The flight allegedly leads
to the moon around the moon, but there is no test of the Lunar Module
if the electronic devices can survive the Van Allen belts or not.
(In: Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with
the CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006);
Wisnewski,
S.120)
All claims of the NASA that the Lunar Module has been well tested are a
lie (Wisnewski, p.121).
Officially the astronauts William
A. Anders, James A. Lovell and Frank Bormann are on board.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 8)
But it seems that also this flight is not a "space flight" because the
landing data for the manned capsule on Earth with a distance of only
2.6 resp. 2 km from the planned landing point are much too precise and
the capsule cannot have come from a "moon flight". This is a faked
flight: The
rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over
the landing spot as if it had been in training 1000s of times already.
(In:
Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion
Dollar
Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski,
S.238-243).
[But the greedy
media
greedy for sensations are reporting a perfect flight to make propaganda
against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the
newspapers].
| Apollo
8: Faked NASA fotos and presentation of a faked flight |
|
|
|
|
 Apollo 8: This Earth rise is a
lie in colour. The foto is from the planet model at Langley and is a
foto composition.
|
Apollo 8: This re-entry into
the lower dense atmosphere is a lie. The stars must not have tails.
|
Apollo 8: Rescue of the capsule
in the water with 2.6 resp. 2 km distance from the planned landing
point. This is a perfect airdrop.
|
Apollo 8: The astronaut come out
of the helicopter on the air craft carrier. Welcome ceremony with media
ceremony.
|
LOLA planetarium with a big moon model with a railway around it to
simulate moon orbits, and also foto compositions with other planets are
possible...
Foto from 1
August1965, foto no.: L-65-5579.
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm;
(August 2006)
3-13 March 1969
Faked
flight Apollo 9
Officially this is the first flight with a whole Lunar Module. But the
flight officially reaches only a near Earth orbit. At the beginning of
the test of the landing engine of the Lunar Module the engine begins to
spit and to stutter (Wisnewski, p.121).
Officially the astronauts James McDivitt, David R. Scott and Russell L.
Schweickart are on board.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 9)
According to the landing data with a distance of only 5 km from the
planned landing point for the manned capsule the landing is much too
precise and it cannot be a flight from an Earth orbit. This is a faked
flight: The
rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over
the landing spot as if it had been in training 1000s of times already.
(In:
Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion
Dollar
Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski,
p.238-243).
 |
Splashdown
of Apollo 9
The
splashdown of "Apollo 9". The media made a joke of it to show the
splashdown live in TV by helicopter to pretend to the public the
capsule had come from a "moon flight"...
[The
greedy media
greedy for sensations are again reporting a perfect flight to make
propaganda
against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the
newspapers].
|
Four months yet to the first "moon landing"...
18-26 May 1969
Faked
flight Apollo 10
Apollo 10 is officially said have reached the moon with the whole Lunar
Module. The flight of the Lunar Module in space is said to have flown
smoothly, but an unmanned landing shall not have been performed
(Wisnewski, p.121).
Officially the astronauts Eugene Cernan, Thomas Stafford and John
W. Young are on Bord.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 10)
According to the landing data wit a distance of 2.4 km from the landing
point for the manned capsule the landing is much too precise for a
flight coming from an Earth orbit or from a "moon flight". This is a
faked flight: The
rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over
the landing spot as if it had been in training 1,000s of times already.
(In:
Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion
Dollar
Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski,
p.238-243).
[But the greedy
media
greedy for sensations are again reporting a perfect flight to make
propaganda
against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the
newspapers].
| Apollo
10: Faked NASA fotos and the presentation of a faked flight |
|
Apollo
10 foto 1: Start of an empty rocket
|
 |
Apollo 10 foto 2: NASA claims
this would be a moon's horizon. This is a horizon of the moon model
from simulation center at Langley...
|
|
Apollo
10 foto 3: NASA claims
this would be the moon surface with long shadows. The foto comes from
the moon model from the simulation center at Langley and has been
coloured retrospectively...
The shadows seem to be much too long for the perspective. And it's
strange that the shadows on foto 2 are not this extremely black as on
foto 3...
|
 |
Apollo 10 foto 4: NASA
claims
this rills on the moon. The foto comes from the planet model of the
simulation center at Langley.
Such geometrically precisely cut craters are not possible in nature.
It seems somebody had really geometrical precisely modeled...
|
 |
Apollo 10 foto 5: NASA claims
this would be a crater landscape from the moon. The landscape is from
the planet model at Langley from the simulation center.
When you see the long shadows on the moon on foto 3 and 4 the shadows
are here much too short.
|
On the so called "moon fotos"
there is no unity according to the intensity of shadows and there is no
logic between the lengths of the shadow according to the perspective.
The fotos are faked products of the CIA foto laboratory. And the CIA
headquarter has it's seat... at Langley, where the simulation center
with the planet model is.
We have 2 months yet to
the first "moon landing"...
previous next
