Apollo 11 (01): The impossible landing approach
Trip by space without helmet - landing approach of command module instead of "lunar module" - moon lie at Apollo 11
x
Analysis by Michael Palomino (2009)
Comment
This is NOT a conspiracy theory, stupid journalist, but these are the facts which prove that moon landings partly have happened in moon halls and in photo compositions. You don't believe it? The facts will stay.
Michael Palomino 2009
Abbreviations
DAC: "Data Acquisition Camera"
LM: "Lunar Module"
LMP: "Lunar Module Pilot"
RCS: "Reaction Control System"
CSM: "Command Service Module"
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-36-5291: Neil Armstrong is said to be here on the space trip in the command module, and this without helmet, an impossibility
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5291.jpg
Training photo:
-- the photo cannot be from a moon flight outside of the atmosphere because nuclear radiation outside of the atmosphere is much too high to survive there, and without helmet this will never function at all.
The photo is from a training, and probably it is an arranged photo.
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-36-5292: Michael Collins is said to be here on a space trip in the command module, and this without helmet, an impossibility
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5292.jpg
Training photo:
-- the photo cannot be from a moon flight outside of the atmosphere because nuclear radiation outside of the atmosphere is much too high to survive there, and without helmet this will never function at all.
The photo is from a training, and probably it is an arranged photo.
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-36-5293: sight from an Earth orbit to the Earth with light show effect by the atmosphere. The photo can be from any flight around the Earth
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5293.jpg
Earth orbit photo:
-- the photo can be from any Earth orbit flight. Moon flights are not possible because of the high radioactivity without atmosphere. So the photo is not from a "moon flight" for sure, but the photo is from a normal Earth orbit flight.
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-36-5384: Part of the docking/tunnel hardware in the Command Module at the time the crew first entered the lunar module (LM).
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5384.jpg
Training photo:
-- the photo is from the training
-- on a moon flight Van Allen belts would be passed which is not possible, whole electricity system would fail.
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-36-5385: "Astronaut" Neil Armstrong floats in the tunnel connecting the lunar module (LM) and the command module (CM), using the TV to document Buzz doing a LM inspection. This photo was taken by Mike Collins. So claims NASA.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5385.jpg
Training photo from an Earth orbit flight:
-- the photo cannot be from a moon flight outside of the atmosphere because nuclear radiation outside of the atmosphere is much too high to survive there, and without helmet this will never function at all
-- the photo is from a training flight from an Earth orbit flight, and it must have been a low height where it's possible to survive without helmet.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-36-5389: This photo, taken during the initial LM inspection, on the day before lunar orbit insertion, shows the station of the lunar module, and a 16-mm Data Acquisition Camera (DAC) mounted in the LMP's window.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5389.jpg
Training photo:
A flight through space to the moon is not possible because of nuclear radiation. So the photo probably is a normal training photo, from a training in the night with a strong spot light. It's not more.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-36-5390: "Astronaut" Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin during the first inspection of the lunar module, photo by "astronaut" Neil Armstrong
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5390.jpg
Training photo:
A flight through space to the moon is not possible because of nuclear radiation. So the photo probably is a normal training photo, from a training in the night with a strong spot light. It's not more.
At the same time there can be made out a hero worship: NASA is presenting the "astronauts" as "good comrades" who are taking photos from each other. By this they become false models for the "USA" and this leads to psychological megalomania.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-36-5392: the station of the "lunar module". NASA claims that this photo was taken during the first inspection shortly before the "moon landing".
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-36-5392.jpg
Training photo:
A flight through space to the moon is not possible because of nuclear radiation. So the photo probably is a normal training photo, from a training in the night with a strong spot light. It's not more.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-5389 and AS11-5390, composed panoramic photo: the station of the "lunar module" with Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin. NASA claims that the photos had been taken during the first inspection of the lunar module before the first "moon landing" and had been composed then by Bob Farwell.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-5389-90.jpg
Training photo:
A flight through space to the moon is not possible because of nuclear radiation. So the photo probably is a normal training photo, from a training in the night with a strong spot light. It's not more.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-36-5404: NASA claims that this would be the "sight back" from the "moon flight" from the "lunar module" to Earth
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-36-5404.jpg
Training photo and photo composition:
The photo cannot be from a "moon flight" because a "moon flight" is not possible because of high radioactivity in space. The photo is easy to produce by implanting the parts of the lunar module from training on a black surface, and implanting a minimized Earth.
Now are following photos which are said to be from the "moon flight" and should show either the moon or the Earth. But a "moon flight" is not possible because of high radioactivity. So, all these photos are photo compositions, or the photos are taken from a planet and moon model.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5434: NASA claims that this would be the "view back" from the "moon flight" seeing the Earth, taken by Neil Armstrong
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5434.jpg
Photo composition
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5435: NASA claims that this would be a "view back" from the "moon flight" from the "lunar module" seeing the Earth after a slight relative pitch to the left: Earth now appears near the RCS quad on Neil's side.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5435.jpg
Photo composition
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5436: NASA claims that this would be the view of Neil Armstrong to the moon.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5436.jpg
Photo composition
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5437: NASA claims that this would be the view to the "Apollo Landing Site 2" and NASA even gives names to the craters as Maskelyne (an English court astronomer) and Moltke (a German Field Marshal General) and NASA even claims to know how big the craters are.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5437.jpg
Photo composition
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5438: Tis is another view to the moon with it's "moon craters", NASA claims.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5438.jpg
Photo composition
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5439: NASA claims that this would be an Earth rise during a "moon orbit" before the undocking of the "lunar module" during the approach to the "moon"
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5439.jpg
Photo composition:
It seems improbable that the astronauts had taken photos during the "approach to the moon". They had to do other things. But a "moon flight" is impossible anyway because of high radioactivity in space.
So also this photo is a photo composition: The "moon landscape" was taken from a moon model and was implanted on a black surface. The "lunar module" comes from a training photo, and the Earth was added in a minimization.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5440, AS11-37-5441 and AS11-37-542, NASA claims that these would be some more sequences from Earth rise before the moon landing of Apollo 11.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5440.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5441.jpg
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5442.jpg
Photo compositions:
-- a flight to the moon is not possible because of high radioactivity
-- NASA is joking around with photo compositions with Earth rises producing a romantic atmosphere at the reader as if the moon would be a "child" of "mother Earth".
The readers are "seduced to the moon" by this NASA procedure, with beautiful names of "moon craters" and of "moon landscapes", but they all come from the moon model, and with Earth rises which are simple photo compositions.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5443: Well, NASA claims now, this would be the sight on the Command Service Module (CMS) after the undocking procedure. According to NASA the "moon landscape" would be 195 km under it and would be called "Mare Fecunditatis" ("Sea of Fertility").
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5443.jpg
Photo compositions:
-- a "moon flight" is not possible because of high radioactivity in space
-- the photo is a photo from the moon model and with a composed, simple shadow
-- the flying object is not the landing "lunar module", but this is the Command Service Module which - according to the "moon landing scheme" - should stay in the moon orbit. But the NASA manipulators implanted the CMS as if it would land on the moon. So, it seems that the NASA manipulators have confused the Command Module with the Lunar Module
-- the "moon surface" is brown or ocher / ochre, and this does not at all correspond to the later "moon photos" of the lunar surface where the surface is white
-- the reader are further manipulated by NASA romanticism by calling the moon plain a "Sea of Fertility". By this the basic forces of life are called and the whole world is driven into a moon madness.
The planned "moon landing" according to NASA and Wernher von Braun (scheme)
The "moon landing" according to Wernher von Braun, the "father" of the "moon landing": The "Lunar Module" should land, and the Command Module should stay in the moon orbit with the Service Module performing more orbits:
The "moon landing" with the detached "Lunar Module", and the Command Module is staying in the orbit with the Service Module performing more orbits (scheme from the book "Bemannte Raumfahrt" (Engl. "Manned Space Flight" by Wernher von Braun personally (1963)
So, the Command Module with it's Service Module have to stay in a horizontal position to perform their moon orbits, and the "Lunar Module" should tip slowly by 90 degrees and fly to the moon. But NASA shows it to the contrary:
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5444: NASA claims that this would be one more sequence of the Command Module over the "moon"
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5444.jpg
Photo composition:
-- a "moon flight" is not possible because of high radioactivity in space
-- the photo is a photo from the moon model and with a composed, simple shadow
-- the craters become bigger, and this is the proof that here should be shown a "moon landing" with the Command Module with its Service Module. But there should land a "Lunar Module", and not a Command Module. The NASA manipulators confused the "Lunar Module" with the Command Service Module (CMS).
Another alternative would be that the Command Module with it's Service Module would have flown in fact in a right angle over the "moon" and under it had undocked the "Lunar Module". But this would contradict to the scheme of the moon landing planner Wernher von Braun which projects moon orbits in a horizontal position. At the same tame has to be put the question how the photo should have been made "from above" when the Lunar Module had undocked under it.So also this alternative is not possible. So the only possibility is a wrong photo composition. It seems that the NASA manipulators had their head more at drinking champaign than at their manipulation work...
The moon model LOLA
In Langley (directly aside the head quarters of "American" secret service CIA) there was a big planetarium. There could be simulated "moon orbits" on a little railway, and by this there could be "filmed" moon orbits, and the public did not notice the fraud:
LOLA moon model with railway around, in the background another artificial planet; photo from 1 August 1965, photo no. L-65-5579. Photos with an "L" signature are from the simulation plant of Langley.
(In: James R. Hansen: Spaceflight Revolution: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum (Engl: Lies in Space"); Knaur Edition 2005, p.286, 288-289)
Well, with this moon model, with a good "photo studio" and with good photo composers it was possible to produce a lot of "moon photos" and to pretend many "moon orbits". But the NASA manipulators of Apollo 11 also made the big mistakes to let down the Command Module to the moon instead the "Lunar Module". The wrong photos are going on:
NASA even claims to know the moon coordinates, and again the crater is called with personalities of the Western culture, for example a crater "Taruntius", a philosopher, mathematician and astrologer of the Roman Empire, another crater is called Anvil, and a ridge is called "Dorsum Cayeux" (Latin "dorsum" for "back", Cayeux is a French holiday resort with a casino at the French Atlantic coast).
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5445.jpg
Photo composition:
-- a "moon flight" is not possible because of high radioactivity in space
-- the photo is a picture of the moon model and the shadow is implanted, and a minimized photo of the "Command Module" from the training or from a transport
-- so here is landing on the wrong part of the lunar rocket, the Command Module with it's Service Module instead of the "Lunar Module"
-- at the same the readers feel culturally formed when they know the crater's names with their meanings.
It's perverse that NASA is linking "moon landing" with history, cultural history and geography of the Western culture. The moon landing fake is linked with "education" to make it "interesting" for the upper class. But it's even more perverse how stupid the journalists are which don't want to notice this big mistakes of NASA that here was landing a Command Module instead of a "Lunar Module".
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5446: NASA claims that this would be one more sequence of the Command Module over the "moon"
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5446.jpg
Photo composition:
-- the scene is going on with the wrong part of the moon rocket landing on the moon, the Command Module with it's Service Module instead of the "Lunar Module"
-- add to this it's impossible to make photos from moving objects in long sequences in the same position, here of a vertical falling object.
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5447: NASA claims now the Command Module would be over the "Sea of Tranquility". NASA claims that the landing site of Apollo 11 would be in the center/centre of the photo, in the upper left part would be crater Moltke and the Hypatia Rille, right would be crater Collins, crater Aldrin should be in the upper part right, and crater Sabine E, D and B would be renamed later after the "astronauts" Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5447.jpg
Photo composition:
-- this is again the moon model
-- the photo shows once again a landing Command Module instead of a landing "Lunar Module".
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5448: NASA claims that the Command Module is near crater Schmidt with its sharp shape. The part of the crater at the lower margin right in the corner should be the Western part of crater Sabine, and the partly visible margin of the crater of the right margin would be from crater Ritter. This should be the last photo of the "Lunar Module" (LM) before the landing approach. The "moon landing" would have been then eventually one "moon orbit" later.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5448.jpg
Suddenly there should be a "Lunar Module" now whereas there was always a Command Module before. At the same time the moon lie cannot be stopped because the stupid journalists have to follow their chief editors which are steered by CIA. CIA is NASA itself.
Conclusions
The whole landing approach from Apollo 11 is a lie. NASA is reducing itself to absurdity showing a Command Module with Service Module instead of a "Lunar Module" as a "moon landing". It's a surprise that already the landing approach of Apollo 11 is such a lie. It seems that the NASA manipulators had no idea of the "moon landing".
This is NOT a conspiracy theory, stupid journalist, but these are the facts which prove that moon landings partly have happened in moon halls and in photo compositions. You don't believe it? The facts will stay.
